The 2020s were once reassuringly in the distant future, and a popular setting for science fiction; now we find ourselves living in that decade. How prescient were those SF authors of the past? Are their predicted settings anything like current conditions? And how much amusement may modern readers derive from visions of yesterday’s tomorrow? Let’s find out!
The End of the Dream by Philip Wylie (1972)
The optimism of the 1970s proves unfounded. The decades that follow are a series of escalating cataclysms caused by humanity’s ecological hubris. Great cities burn. Rivers boil. Pollution poisons the air. Billions die. The calamities spare no one.
However, calamity brings reform. By June 6, 2023, the few remaining humans have seen the error of their ways. An ecologically prudent world government oversees recovery. Too bad for the survivors that their efforts are just a smidge too belated.
This is basically a stupider, much louder version of Brunner’s The Sheep Look Up (or given the publication dates, Brunner’s novel is the much-improved version of The End of the Dream). I am a little surprised that this book was never the basis for a disaster film, given that other Wylie works made it to the silver screen.
2020 Vision edited by Jerry Pournelle (1974)
There were two desiderata for stories selected for this collection. Stories had to be set in the year 20201. The settings had to be plausible; there would be no tales featuring super-science or pseudoscience unless the author thought those were plausible. Pournelle took the further step of inviting readers to critique the predictions at the 2020 Worldcon, an unusual invitation that for various reasons proved impractical2.
So, how does this collection stand up? The stories are a mixed bag but most reward reading. Some imagine a US that has been much reduced, whether conquered by the rascally Soviets or dominated by Japanese commercial prowess. Others imagine a US that is still prosperous. Most of the authors thought crewed space travel would be more developed than it is.
For the most part, the stories reflect the anxieties of 1970 more than they do the anxieties of 20203. There are two partial exceptions. David McDaniel’s Prognosis: Terminal focuses on the impact of technological change upon artists; the details are not our details, but the feel is familiar. Dian Girard’s “Eat, Drink, and Be Merry” imagines a world in which women are denied bodily autonomy to the extent that they aren’t even allowed to select their own meals. No doubt she was inspired by the status of women in the 1970s. Nevertheless, it would be easy to find modern analogs to her protagonist’s situation.
Rule 34 by Charles Stross (2011)
In Stross’ setting, the inexorable march of Moore’s Law has led to impressively capable robots, home fabricators, and powerful software that is insufficiently documented. There are new nations, many of them corruptible. This could be a golden age for criminal innovation… or so the criminal organization known as the Organization thinks.
Across Europe, criminals suffer fatal (in some cases NSFW) mishaps. Each might be the product of unlikely, but possible, chance. Taken together, they suggest that some unseen architect is at work, methodically eliminating Europe’s criminals. Will Inspector Kavanaugh catch the mastermind? Will career criminals Anwar and the Toymaker survive the mastermind’s attention?
Aside from computers and robotics not being quite as far along as envisioned, the big difference between Stross’ version of the 2020s and ours is this: Stross assumed global scale corruption and criminality would require competence, whereas it turns out that’s an optional extra. Sufficiently determined, well-placed nincompoops can get surprising far.
Parable of the Sower by Octavia Butler (1993)
The United States of America of the 2020s can maintain lunar bases and dispatch expeditions to Mars. What the US cannot do, or chooses not to do because the short-term consequences would be inconvenient, is to address climate change or the slow but inexorable collapse of civilization that results. Absent effective federal or state response, individual Americans are forced to cope with an increasingly dysfunctional society as best they can.
Lauren Olamina’s family is comparatively lucky. Their enclave has thus far been secure. Lauren’s father still has his job. Safety is an illusion, alas. Lauren’s relatives are murdered and her home is looted and burned. Lauren herself is forced to search for refuge in a world where the only guarantee is that things will get worse.
I cannot help but notice that this series is the only one of the five listed here that I see frequently cited on social media, often with particular attention directed to particular passages. Of what possible relevance to our era could a dystopia driven by greed, fear, and foolishness have? Sadly, I lack the space to address this.
Directive 51 by John Barnes (2010)
In this setting, the 2024 US presidential election is looming. The US and the world in general appear to face purely conventional threats, such as terrorism. In fact, computer tech has passed an inflection point that allows a few determined, networked amateurs to wreak apocalyptic havoc. On their own, none of Daybreak’s members are significant threats. Together, they can—and do—kneecap civilization.
Gigaton explosions bloom across the planet. America’s president and everyone in the line of succession are dead. What survives of the nation is riven by a near civil war between factions led by two surviving senior functionaries, Graham Weisbrod and Cameron Nguyen-Peters4.
Barnes offers a much more placid 2010 to 2024 than we actually got, albeit with a significant bill to be paid at the end. The notion that the loser of a presidential election might simply refuse to acknowledge his loss seems more prescient now than it did in 2010. At least there’s no sign of deranged third parties rendering the electoral dispute moot through the use of gigaton nukes—at least so far. 2024 has been a year of surprises…
These are only a few of the 2020s that SF authors have imagined. There are many I did not mention. In retrospect, it’s a little odd there were so few that offered optimistic views of our current era. Feel free share your favorites in the comments below.
